Menu

Showing posts with label Shivchei haBesht. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shivchei haBesht. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 August 2026

564) Oleksa Dovbush: A Ukrainian Baal Shem Tov?

Oleksa Dovbush 1700-1745

Introduction

This articlebased extensively on the research by Professor Boris Czerny[1]examines some unusual similarities between the Baal Shem Tov (the founder of the Chassidic movement, c.1700-1760) and Oleksa Dovbush (the Ukrainian Robin Hood and rebel leader, 1700-1745). Czerny researched the archives of Kyiv and Lviv, as well as Israel, and analysed texts written in Ukrainian, Russian, Hebrew and Yiddish. He also consulted police and court records concerning Oleksa Dovbush to construct his revolutionary biography (Czerny 2018:34). I thank Professor Czerny for gifting me a copy of his book (in French!). 

Both Oleksa Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov were born at the same time and operated within the same geographical area of the Carpathian regiona 1 500-kilometre arc through Romania, Ukraine, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, Serbia, and the Czech Republic. The Carpathian region is known for its unique and traditional mountain culture. During the time of Oleksa Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov, western Ukraine was under Polish rule. 

Carpathian mountain culture

Around the early eighteenth century, the central and eastern Carpathianswhere Oleksa Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov both originatedwere home to the Hutsuls. The meaning of ‘Hutsul’ is subject to some scholarly debate. According to K. Milewski, it means ‘nomads,’ and according to Ivan Krypiakevych, it means ‘brigands’—robbers, bandits, and gangs that ambush travellers and raid settlements. Hutsul historically refers to outlaws operating in rural and mountainous areas. Between 1738-45, Dovbush led the ‘opryshoks’ (opryshky) or ‘noble robbers’ who formed the “anti-feudal and national liberation movement active in the Carpathian Mountains” (Fialkova, 2011:1). 

The traditional Hutsul folksongs lauded the valiant deeds of their heroes, particularly Oleksa Dovbush. Hutsuls also have a distinctive folk music and dance. The Hutsuls were known for sheep herding and seasonal migration, elaborate woodwork and wooden architecture (perhaps also reflected in the beautiful wooden synagogue of the Baal Shem Tov). 


Woodwork in the replica of the Baak Shem Tov Shule in Mezbuz, Ukraine. The original was destroyed by the Nazis.

Hutsul folklore celebrated mountain heroes and loner outlaw figures. The overwhelmingly peasant Hutsuls came to be dominated and oppressed by Polish magnates and Hungarian nobles, but they soon began to rebel under the leadership of Oleksa Dovbush. Resistance has always been associated with Carpathian culture: 

[T]he Carpathians have always been a region where the resistance of indigenous pastoral communities has manifested itself in all aspects of life—social, spiritual, economic, and political” (Hosejko in Czerny 2018:4). 

Literacy among the Hutsuls remained low until as late as the twentieth century. Although their clothes often contained colourful embroidery, the outer garments for both men and women were usually a black or dark red coat (serdak) (Encyclopedia of Ukraine, entry Hutsuls). One wonders how much of the indigenous Hutsul mountain culture went on to influence the Baal Shem Tov. 

Hutsul uprising

The Hutsul uprising of the 1730s and 1740s was a popular peasant rebellion in the Carpathian Mountains against economic and social oppression by the Polish nobility. Led by Oleksa Dovbush, the opryshoks raided wealthy estates and redistributed the stolen property to local serfs. Oleksa Dovbush adopted the strategy of Robin Hood as his way to attain social justice, and he robbed from the rich and gave to the poor. The movement was brutally suppressed following Dovbush's betrayal and death in 1745, but the rebellion left an enduring legacy in Ukrainian history and folklore as a powerful symbol of resistance against foreign feudal rule. 

Were Jews targeted by the opryshoks?

While there were Orthodox Christian priests active among the opryshoks, they were generally of a lower order. They attacked Roman Catholics and Greek Catholics as well as Jews (but generally the richer Jews). Jews held an intermediate economic position between the richer Polish landlords and the poorer local Ukrainian masses. Often Jews appeared to be more influential than they really were because they worked for and administered the estates of the Polish nobility. In fact: 

in the absence of Polish magnates on the ground, in the villages of the Carpathians, Jews could appear to be the sole and true masters (Czerny 2018:26). 

The Ukrainians believed their only way to achieve liberation from the feudal system was through violence. While Jews certainly were often targeted as they “were generally the most prosperous residents of the village (Czerny 2018:37): 

“their victimization was not uniform throughout: it was deadliest in Khmelnytsky’s uprising [17th century], and seemingly mildest in that of the opryshoks [18th century]” (Fialkova, 2011:2). 

Thus, during the time of Oleksa Dovbush, Jews may have been targeted but not necessarily because they were Jewish. There are accounts of Dovbush even giving poor Jews money for the Sabbath (Hnatiuk 1910:111). 

Czerny’s personal interest in Hutsul culture

Czernywhose grandmother came from the Hutsul region—has a personal interest in Oleksa Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov, because he writes: 

“The Hutsul region as a territory piqued my interest as a researcher because this was where I discovered folk tales and stories that have both Ukrainian and Jewish characters” (Czerny 2019-). 

He makes a profound point on scholarship in general: 

“A scholar always seems to be on a quest. In research there is always a personal dimension—both in the reasons behind the research and in its object” (Czerny 2019-). 

Czerny was clearly emotionally and personally moved by a visit to the Hutsul region: 

“[D]uring my visit…I encountered quite a few men who resembled my father. They spoke the same language, with the same accent as my father. And this was delightful to my ears” (Czerny 2019-). 

This prompted Czerny to further explore his Ukrainian and Jewish roots: 

“I searched for texts that contain Jewish characters from the Carpathians and the Hutsul region” (Czerny 2019-). 

He soon discovered that Ukrainians and Jews shared common and similar hero figures—Oleksa Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov—who, according to frequent Chassidic accounts, actually knew each other, although Czerny questions the historicity of the two ever meeting in reality. 

Oleksa Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov

Ukrainian ethnographers and ethnologists have gathered various accounts about Oleksa Dovbush. He emerges as a Robin Hood figure who was eventually imprisoned by the Poles and executed. The stories of Oleksa Dovbush encounter owners of taverns and overnight lodgings, bankers, usurers, peasants and butchersthe same way that Chassidic chroniclers describe the Baal Shem Tov. 

Oleksa Dovbush, the chief of the Hutsuls,  comes across as defiant, proud, valiant. He is physically strong. Politically, he resists the Polish aggressor, and locally, he resists the landlords. He stands for justice and the people. In a similar manner, the Baal Shem Tov represents the people. He stands for the democratisation of Judaism from the tyranny of the rabbinate. He is also physically strong and sometimes even depicted as a shoveller of sand, but his main strength lies in the soul. 

Chassidic stories

Dov Noy (1960) was the first scholar to identify Dovbush in Chassidic literature. In these sources, the often anonymous ‘robber’ in the stories of the Baal Shem Tov is a reference to Oleksa Dovbush (Fialkova, 2011:4). There are Chassidic stories where the Baal Shem Tov tries to introduce Dovbush to a more spiritual strength, like experiencing union with nature, and abandoning quests for enrichment. 

“The Jewish storytellers of the Hasidic communities – which were particularly numerous in Ukraine and, more specifically, in the Carpathian region – considered legends and shevahim (praises) as a way to glorify the miraculous and mystical abilities of the rebbes (Hasidic rabbis)” (Czerny 2022-). 

According to folklore literature which Larisa Fialkova discovered in the Israel Folktale Archives, Dovbush’s mother became a widow while pregnant with her son. She was penniless, and the only person who would bring her some food was a Jew, an innkeeper. This Jew then named her son Dovbush (little bear). Dovbush was always associated with Jews. In Chassidic stories, the Baal Shem Tov is depicted as acting as a mentor to Oleksa Dovbush. In some stories, the Baal Shem Tov’s haunting melodies and spiritual abilities impress Dovbush more than physical strength. 

“In the Jewish stories, Oleksa Dovbush acts as a force of resistance, which is based on his own physical powers. But gradually this strength recedes, finding an ally for itself in the person of Ba`al Shem Tov” (Czerny 2019-). 

Walking in the mountains

In a famous story about the Baal Shem Tov and the ‘robbers,’ high up in the Carpathian mountains, we read: 

“Israel [Baal Shem Tov] took his wife with him high into the Carpathians. Near the village of Zabie he built a cabin for them to live in…But sometimes Israel would take dry bread in a sack, and go away into the hills. He would remain by himself all week long; before the Sabbath he would return home. He would remain at home during the Sabbath, and during the following week again take bread and wander among the high hills, contemplating God. 

In those mountains, too, there were many robbers. They had their forts in the forests, and they sallied out in bands to attack wealthy travellers on the roads.

Once, hidden among the trees, a number of these bandits saw the form of a man [the Baal Shem Tov] who walked on the ledge of a mountain-peak. A chasm lay between the cliff he walked upon and the next mountain.

The man seemed absorbed in thought. He did not look where he walked.

‘He will surely walk off the cliff! He will fall into the chasm!’ the bandits cried to one another. They could not move, but watched him. 

Then they saw the two mountains move together, and close the chasm between them. The Master stepped safely from one peak to the other peak. And when he had passed, the mountains separated behind him, and were as they had been, with the chasm lying between them. When the robbers saw this happen they said one to another, ‘He must be a holy man!’ Then they ran toward him and said, ‘Be our judge!’ Rabbi Israel answered, ‘If you will promise never to injure a Jew, I will be your judge.’ They agreed. ‘I live in the cabin near Zabie,’

he said,  ‘When you need a judge to decide your quarrels, come to me’” (Shivchei haBesht, no.9). 

The Baal Shem Tov’s pipe

The expression “They agreed,” in the above story, indicates a form of corroboration between the two heroes. Perhaps related to this storywhere the Baal Shem Tov informs the ‘robbers’ as to where he lives—is the Chassidic legend that Oleksa Dovbush once had to seek refuge in the home of the Baal Shem Tov, and as a token of gratitude gifted the latter his pipe. From then on, the Baal Shem Tov is said to have taught while holding the pipe in his hand. This eminent pipe, known as a ‘lulkah,’ was handed down within Chassidic communities and was recently sold in an auction in Jerusalem. There are many other stories about Dovbush’s ‘robbers’ and ‘bandits’ in the tales of the Baal Shem Tov. 

Beautiful songs

A less-known story about encounters with anonymous robbers was also found by Fialkova (2011:9) in the Israel Folktale Archives: 

“The Baal Shem Tov once takes a teenage boy, Shaul, to accompany him in one of his trips. They stop to rest at an inn where they encounter some Ukrainian villagers that are dancing and singing. Shaul has a wonderful voice which is admired by the villagers who pledge him their friendship. Many years later Shaul, who has become a wealthy merchant, is robbed on his way through the forest. He recognizes his assailants, and reminds them of their meeting at the inn. The robbers ask him to sing and then restore all his property to him” (IFA 1197). 

The underground journey to Jerusalem

There is also the story in Shivchei haBesht depicting Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov as digging an underground tunnel togetheror in some versions the bandits claim to know a shortcut that leads to the Holy Land through cellars and underground passages (Czerny 2018:184)all the way to Jerusalem. However, at some stage in the process, a certain energy descends upon them and informs them that it was not the right time for either to go to Jerusalem. This strange story suggests a common sense of purpose between this unlikely company (Ben-Amos/Mintz 1993:23). Significantly, this very story is known in Ukrainian folklore as well (Vincenz 1979:195). 

A Poem by Naftali Gross 

Naftali Gross (1897-1956) was raised on Chassidic stories. Although this poem was written some two centuries later, it captures the prevailing ethos which seems to merge and fuse the imagery of both Oleksa Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov as they were imagined to have moved through the Carpathian mountains:   

Dovbush spent the whole night in the mountains feasting

His companions brought him the most delicious dishes,

Then we danced, whistled, played the violin and sang.

The Baal Shem Tov meanwhile walked through the forest,

Talking with the wind and the pine needles

Hugging each tree like a friend, a family member.

Stomping his bare feet on the frozen snow,

He spoke with G-d as an equal

Praising with each step the earth beneath his feet…

 

Before the Baal Shem Tov and Dovbush

Borders and barriers disappear…

And trees and grasses and fountains,

Like mills rustle and murmur,

In the ears of Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov” (Naftali Gross). 

Besides featuring prominently in Chassidic stories, Dovbush captured the collective memory of the non-Chassidic and secular world as well, with vast amounts of writing and accounts about him. Often these Jewish sources describe a weak and weary Dovbush (Czerny 2018:204). 

Daniel Klouger

In a story by Daniel Klouger (1951-2025), an Israeli writer and physicist born in Simferopol in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Dovbush is pursued by his enemies and is wounded. He encounters the Baal Shem Tov, who heals him: 

The Besht drove away the pursuers with a magical prayer. He tended to the bandit’s wounds and gave him mountain water to drink” (cited in Czerny 2018:214). 

Ukrainian stories

On the other hand, in the Ukrainian stories, Dovbush is depicted as the embodiment of physical strength and intense revenge against the Polish and Ukrainian lords for oppressing the peasants. His strength is sometimes more cruel than powerful, as he cuts off heads and rips stomachs open—all for the ultimate betterment of the populace. He is ready to sacrifice himself for his people (Czerny 2022-). This cruelty does not come across in the Jewish narratives. In the Ukrainian storiesbesides the cruelty, honour, revenge and an insatiable desire for justicethere is, surprisingly, no hatred or greed. On the contrary, there is generosity because ultimately Dovbush gives away all that he owns.  He truly behaves like a Robin Hood figure and even destroys the peasants' debt receipts.[2]  

“In the Hutsul stories, the rabbis of the Hasidic courts appear as miracle workers, magicians and doctors with extraordinary powers… Jewish magic and its practitioners were part of the everyday landscape of the villages and towns of the multi-ethnic communities that lived in virtual isolation in the mountains” (Czerny 2022-). 

Chassidim and nobility

There are also some parallels between Polish nobility and Chassidim in the way they conducted their hierarchical social structures: 

“Just as the authority of a [Polish] lord was exercised according to a pattern of concentric circles with an ever-widening radius, starting from the members of his family and extending down to the peasants, the head or rebbe of a Hasidic court based his material power on a network that spread out in rhizomes, stretching from his court to his relatives and followers” (Czerny 2018:26). 

Cultural parallels

The parallels between Jews and Ukrainians, particularly Hutsuls, were significant. I read through Czerny’s voluminous research and his collection of Hutsul stories about Dovbush and interactions with Jews, and the sheer quantity of this material on shared cultural experiences is astonishing and should not be underestimated. The Hutsul-Chassidic connection was far from trivial. They reflect complex but intense areas of interaction and coexistence because they were often the only ones present in these high-altitude villages of the Carpathians(Czerny 2018:35): 

“If Jews are found in Ukrainian stories, Ukrainian characters are also present in Jewish tales and legends” (Czerny 2022-). 

In Jewish sources, Dovbush’s encounters with rabbis are not just with the Baal Shem Tov, but with other early Chassidic characters as well (Fialkova 2011:13). Hutsuls often participated in Jewish festivals, especially Purim, dressing up as Haman and running through the village being beaten by Jews. The Hutsuls even developed the expression to be beaten up like a Haman(Czerny 2018:37). The interaction and areas of crossover were particularly intense when it came tonot just Jewsbut the early Chassidim because: 

certain practices shared by the Hutsuls and Hasidic Jews were based on the expression of basic forms of belief and superstition… magic and demonology” (Czerny 2018:35). 

In Chassidic and Hutsul stories, the evil forces can be driven out of a person through the little finger [see Kotzk Blog: 403) Hillel Baal Shem Ra: the Master of the Evil Name.] To this day, tombs like that of the Baal Shem Tov are regarded as miraculous spaces by the local peoples of the Carpathian region (Czerny 2018:38). 

Nostalgia

Czerny notes a certain nostalgia in both the Jewish and Ukrainian versions of the stories, where the settingthe lost paradise of the Carpathian mountains, forests and streamsis the backdrop to a certain intimacy and camaraderie that once existed among this particular group of traditional Jewish and Ukrainian mountain people: 

“I think that in no other folklore in the world can you find stories depicting the encounter of two national heroes from two different cultures of two different peoples. The folklore of the Carpathian Mountains is very special” (Czerny 2019-). 

Analysis

In Jewish and Ukrainian traditions, there is much overlap (if not inversion) between Oleska Dovbush and the Baal Shem Tov: 

“The hero of the other is deprived of culturally unacceptable features by the censorship of tradition… The image of Dovbush in Jewish folklore supplements the image of the Besht (and other holy Jews) in Ukrainian and Polish folklore as two sides of a single phenomenon in neighbouring cultures” (Fialkova 2011:14). 

In a literary sense (and without denying their separate historical existences), the real or imagined interactions between the two hero figures tempt the question: was Dovbush a Ukrainian Baal Shem Tovor was the Baal Shem Tov a Jewish Dovbush?



Two films

Here is a 1959 film on Oleksa Dovbush (with English subtitles): https://www.google.com/search?q=oleksa+dovbush&sca_esv=0bd0d527fc5b0f39&sxsrf=APpeQnuOXSrDgxqrtO6o2EJ-vlBQhfdObQ:1785608673547&ei=4Tluao33ILLGi-gPl6WqgAg&start=10&sa=N&sstk=AU9db-B3KLcp4aFRSO7W44tVLdMfk18ox2iI7GILk9J_icR7kFzSPGZEvHh3XEzQblky5paB3QRfMPYnUOJPly0o87h6n6gvldhVGg&ved=2ahUKEwjN68bVhoCWAxUy4wIHHZeSCoAQ8tMDegQIRRAE&biw=1896&bih=941&dpr=1#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:19468571,vid:EN-aEXTQmcE,st:0

In 2023 a new film, Dovbush” was released during the Russia-Ukraine war, and has broken box office records for Ukraine, with its themes of national self-determination and the struggle against invaders. Luzer Twersky, a former Chassid and descendent of the Baal Shem Tov, plays the role of the Baal Shem Tov!


Bibliography

Ben-Amos, D., and Mintz, J.R., (Translators), 1993, In Praise of the Baal Shem Tov [Shivchei ha-Besht]: The Earliest Collection of Legends about the Founder of Hasidism, Jason Aronson INC., London.

Encyclopedia of Ukraine (entry Hutsuls). Online source: https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CH%5CU%5CHutsuls.htm. Retrieved 28 July 2026.

Czerny, B., 2018, Contes et récits juifs et ukrainiens du pays houtsoule [Jewish and Ukrainian Tales and Stories from the Hutsul Region], PETRA.

Czerny, B., 2019, ‘Tales from the Hutsul region, the meeting place of Oleksa Dovbush and Ba`al Shem Tov’. Online source: https://ukrainianjewishencounter.org/en/tales-from-the-hutsul-region-the-meeting-place-of-oleksa-dovbush-and-baal-shem-tov/. Retrieved 28 July 2026.

Czerny, B., 2022, ‘Dovbush and the Baal-Shem Tov: two heroes of Jewish and Ukrainian national identities’. Online source: Dovbush and the Baal-Shem Tov: two heroes of Jewish and Ukrainian national identities - K. Jews, Europe, 21st Century. Retrieved 28 July 2026.

Fialkova, L., 2011, ‘Oleksa Dovbush: An Alternative Biography of the Ukrainian Hero Based on Jewish Sources’, Fabula, vol. 52 (1/2), 92-108 (1-17).

Hnatiuk, V., 1910, ‘Narodni opovidannia pro opryshkiv (Folktales about the Opryshoks)’, in Entohrafichnyi zbirnyk (Ethnographic collection) 26.

Noy, D., 1960, ‘Agadot Ha-Besht Ba-Harim Ha-Karpatim (The Legends about the Besht in the Carpathians)’, in Mahanaim, Shavuot, 66-73.

Vincenz, S., 1936, Na Wysokiej Poloninie: Obrazy, Dumy i Gawêdy z Wierchowiny Hu culskiej (On the High Uplands, First Part in Polish), Warszawa.

I thank Dr. Avi Harel for the following source:

Hrabovets'kyi, V. Oleksa Dovbush. (1700–1745) לבוב 1994


[1] I thank my Ukrainian-Russian friend Simeon Khazin for drawing my attention to Oleksa Dovbush.

Sunday, 2 February 2025

500) Mining Chassidic stories for kernels of historicity

 


Introduction

This article based extensively on the research by Professor Glynn Dynner[1] examines a possible methodology to extract aspects of historical truths from the often exaggerated and venerating style of Chassidic storytelling. Even within Chassidic circles the ‘Chassidishe Maaseh,’ or Chassidic story, is sometimes acknowledged as a questionable source of information, but this is not always the case. The presentation style of Chassidic stories is often referred to as hagiography as opposed to historiography. Sometimes Chassidic hagiography is so dense and detailed that Ada Rapoport-Albert has coined the phrase “Hagiography with footnotes.”[2] As detailed as the hagiography may be, it is still hard to define Chassidic stories as accurate history. Nevertheless, Dynner asks: 

“Can elements of certain tales stand on their own as historical sources?” (Dynner 2009:655).

 

Sunday, 1 January 2023

411) The Baal Shem Tov of “Okopy”?

The legendary synagogue of the Baal Shem Tov in Piatra Neamț in Western Moldavia

Introduction

All the literature we read on the Baal Shem Tov (1690[1]/1698/[2]1700[3]-1760) gives his birthplace as Okopy, in Podolia, Western Ukraine. However, relatively recent research by Romainian-born Professor Moshe Idel,[4] upon which this article is extensively based, suggests that his birthplace may have been “in the state of Walachia." 

It is amazing how names, dates and ideas sometimes become accepted as truths just because they are repeated often enough. The same thing may apply to the town of Okopy which is always given as the birthplace of the Baal Shem Tov (Besht). Idel draws our attention to the fact that there is no “reliable” (Idel 2011:69) source to corroborate this detail.

Sunday, 19 March 2017

119) CHASSIDISM - A RUSSIAN CONNECTION?

Shivchei haBesht, Laszczow, 1815.
INTRODUCTION:

Did early Chassidism overlap with some aspects of folk Russia or Ukraine in the early 1700’s?
Certainly in terms of music, dress and possibly even certain aspects of philosophy, many would say yes.

Some, however, have tried to downplay this Russian or Ukrainian folk influence, and I could never understand why. I then discovered that there are a number of - albeit controversial - schools of thought which suggest that the Baal Shem Tov (or Besht) may have been influenced by various folk groups, religious cults or even breakaway mystical movements.

SOME PROVOCATIVE THEORIES:

ADAM BAAL SHEM TOV:

The Besht is known to have studied the secrets of mysticism from a certain Adam Baal Shem Tov. His identity is somewhat obscure and there are is some speculation as to who he really was:

R. JOSHUA HESHEL TZOREF?

 According to some researchers, Adam, not being a common Jewish name at that time may have been a pseudonym for R. Heshel Tzoref a known Sabbatean (or follower of the false Messiah, Shabbatai Tzvi who passed away just thirty years earlier)[1] The Besht is known to have had in his possession, and to have made reference to, a book called Sefer haTzoref which contained a reference to Shabbatai Tzvi being the Messiah.

(I’m not suggesting in any way that the Besht subscribed to that view, but am simply recording the piece of information. See KOTZK BLOG 117.)

ADAM ZERNIKOV?

According to other far more radical speculation, this ‘Adam’ may have been a well-known Russian priest Adam Zernikov, of the Raskolnik cult. Y. Eliach suggests that the Besht may have been influenced by Raskol literature and just as they kept their teachings secret, so did he. Raskol literature was outlawed by the Russian Church and the ban was only lifted in 1906. [2]
Adam Zernikov, born in Koenigsberg in 1652, met R. Eliezer, the father of the Besht in Russia, where he - allegedly- transmitted some of his teachings to him.
(Again, I am in no way suggesting that that is true or not. I am merely recording the speculation.)

THE KHLYSTY SECT?

Another group active at the same time was known as the Khlysty sect. They would dress in white, dance during prayers and believed that their leaders could predict the future. The adherents would confess their sins to the leaders who were said to be able to identify the sinners from within the group. They advocated a degree of abstinence and called children ‘little sins’.


Early Kapust edition of Shivchei haBesht.

According to an early Kapust edition of Shivchei haBesht[3], after the passing of his first wife, the Besht was encouraged to marry again. He responded that he did not need a new wife because his son was born by the ‘word’.  For this reason, he had no need to marry again.

This text, however, does not appear in any of the later editions.

SHIVCHEI HABESHT:

It is fascinating to see that this tension of views regarding a possible ‘outside’ influence (to whatever extent) on the founder of Chassidism, is reflected in two different biographical accounts which deal with stories of the Besht.

These books are:  Shivchei haBesht (first published in 1814 in Kopys, White Russia) and Rachamei haAv (first published Chernovitz in 1865).

The Shivchei haBesht appears to be quite comfortable with recording a strong (possibly) Russian influence on the Besht and particularly his father, R. Eliezer. On the other hand, the later work Rachamei Av, written after Chassidism had been firmly established, seems to negate it completely.

The popular Shivchei haBesht, however, is not unanimously accepted as authoritative in all Chassidic circles[4].
Perhaps the fact that it records this Russian influence may be one of the reasons for that.

It’s interesting to note that even secular historians acknowledge that there is, what they refer to as a ‘kernel of historical truth’, in the general theme of events (as opposed to the details of all the actual stories) as described in Shivchei haBesht.

THE SHIVCHEI HABESHT VERSION:

The Shivchei haBesht was written by Dov Baer ben Shmuel haShochet, who was the son-in-law of the Besht's scribe, Alexander Shochet and obviously had personal contact with the Besht himself. It contains more than two hundred stories about the Besht and those associated with him. During the first two years the book sold more than ten thousand copies.[5]

There are two stories in Shivchei haBesht which do appear to link the Besht to strong cultural ties with Russia:

Shivchei haBesht Lemberg (Lvov) Edition. 1885, p. 4.

According to this version:

Before the Besht was born, his father, R. Eliezer had been living in Wallachia. He and his wife were already old. It happened that bandits came and took R. Eliezer captive. His wife had to flee and because of her poverty she was forced to become a midwife. He was taken to a far-away where there were no Jews and sold. He served his new master well and became head of the household. He was given permission not to have to work on Shabbat. After much time he decided to flee, but was told in a dream to stay where he was because there was still something he had to accomplish there. The master had dealings with the king’s advisor and offered his servant to him as a gift.’

This event must have occurred towards the end of the 1600’s, as the Besht was only born around 1700.

It appears as if the place which barred all Jews from entering, and even from doing business at that time, was the Muscovite Duchy in Russia. So it seems that R. Eliezer spent some time in Russia.




The story continues:

Then one time the King took his soldiers on boats to wage war...’

Historically this may coincide with the Azov Campaign of 1695/6, where Peter the Great attacked the city of Azov, and this happened to be Russia’s first sea battle. The attack was a failure and Shivchei haBesht describes this following chain of events:





R. Eliezer is one of the sailors on the ships and advises on how to achieve victory, by informing the navy that iron pillars were embedded within the ocean floor, preventing the ships from approaching the enemy port. For this information, he is hailed as a hero and is brought to the king on a ‘small boat’. He is then shaved and made to change his clothes.

Peter the great was known to have disliked beards and even the old Russian traditional clothes. He ordered people to be clean shaven and to wear ‘modern’ clothing.

As a reward, R. Eliezer was given the minister’s daughter as a wife. Of course, he did not consummate the marriage. Eventually, he revealed to her that he was a Jew and she allowed him to return to his home where he was reunited with his real wife.

Soon, although both were now in their nineties, a son was born. He was called Israel and became known as the Baal Shem Tov.



Another story which also indicates some knowledge and interaction with Russian culture can be seen in the following story:

It once happened that the Besht was unable to speak. He hinted to his students that they should bring him his teffilin, which he then put on. His power of speech returned to him. When asked what had happened, he explained that as a result of a sin of his youth he had been punished by losing his ability to speak. He explained that the prosecuting angel had appeared in the form of a gentile carrying a metal rod and wanting to assault him. The teffilin had saved him. But the attacker shouted in Russian to ‘take off the leather’ but to no avail.

Because of the reference to the Russian language, this too may indicate that the Besht was either born or spent his early years in Russia.[6]


THE RACHAMEI HA’AV VERSION:

About a hundred years after the passing of the Besht, a newer and different version concerning the birth of the Besht is presented by the Rachamei haAv:[7]

The Besht’s father, R. Eliezer was a very kind person. Once, Elijah the prophet decided to test him and appeared to him on Shabbat afternoon dressed like an old man who desecrated the holy day. Instead of rebuking the Shabbat desecrator, R. Eliezer invited him into his home and gave him a Shabbat meal. After Shabbat he gave the old man some money. Then Elijah revealed his true self to R. Eliezer and told him that as a reward he would be given a son who would brighten the whole world.

According to this version, there is no mention made of any time spent in Russia. There is also no mention of the close relationship between R. Eliezer and the ministers of the king, of the meeting with Peter the Great and haven been given the minister's daughter was a wife.  Nothing of the culture of Russia is alluded to as an influencing factor whatsoever.

Could it be that later writers of Chassidic history wanted to remove all traces of any foreign influences surrounding the birthing of the new movement?



Shivchei haBesht Berditchev Edition, 1865.


ANALYSIS:

Sadly, so many question the authenticity of so much that is written about such a pivotal spiritual figure in Jewish history.

It’s interesting to see that some historical tax registers record that the house in which the Besht lived in his later years enjoyed tax-free status, which shows the esteem in which he was held by the government. Also, some court records refer to him and some of his contemporaries which appear to correlate with a number of events as described in Shivchei haBesht.

1758 Polish tax census of Medzhybizh showing Baal Shem occupying house #95


Even if we leave alone some of the radical and perhaps preposterous (although not impossible) theories concerning just how far Chassidism was influenced by these foreign cultures, are we not mirroring the same bias in the other direction if we deny any overlap whatsoever?

We do know that the Besht lived in the forests and came into contact with folk communities, either from Russia or the Ukraine. He knew how to use plants for healing, he distributed amulets and was generally regarded as a medicine man. Since he didn’t fit the mould of typical urban rabbis of the time, it is quite within reason to assume that he took some of this knowledge from folk culture.

Carpathian Mountains today.


In my youth and early adulthood, I fell under the spell and allure of Chassidism. The rabbis and teachers whom I allowed to influence me were all Chassidim. I was intrigued by the Baal Shem Tov and his teachings but particularly by his stories.

While listening to the stories which were a central part of the Chassidic oral tradition, no one ever made any attempt to hide the fact that the Baal Shem Tov interacted with all levels of Russian society, including non-Jews. On the contrary, it was considered praiseworthy to recount how the Besht sought out shepherds and ordinary folk who spent their lives in the mountains and composed beautiful melodies which tugged at the heart-strings.

Ordinary love songs were converted and elevated to holy songs of yearning for G-d, and often even wordless melodies were adopted into Chassidism without denying their secular and non-Jewish origins. (This is something that the Chabad movement, for example, also appears to be quite comfortable with, although obviously without the more radical speculation as to how far it may have gone.)

Early Chassidism probably was, to a large extent, unashamedly rooted in folk culture and what we today would call the ‘populist’ movements of that time.

If a degree of reasonable overlap is acknowledged by many, the question remains as to why did some of the later writings, originating well after the movement had already been firmly established, feel the need to deny this?

And - given the wide range of provocative speculation - is the fact that the Shivchei haBesht does not hide the potential for such possible influences, one of the reasons why some came to regard it as being an unauthoritative account of the origins of Chassidism?




[1] See: The Sabbatean Prophet R. Heschel Zoref - R. Adam Baal Shem, by G. Scholem.
[2] This is the view of Y. Eliach in The Russian Dissenting Sects and Their Influence on Israel Baal Shem Tov, Founder of Hassidism.
See Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research36 (1968): 67-68. - For a critique of this theory, see chap. 3, 68-75.
See also: On the Origins of the Chassidic Movement – A Critique By Rabbi Dovid Markel:
[3] P. 36.
[4] According to R. Dovid Markel: “See Shem HaGedolim HaChadash (R. Ahahon Valdin) who writes that the author did a disservice to the Besht by printing inauthentic stories—thus causing a reader to doubt authentic ones as well. See as well Likutei Halachot, Pesach 7:3 from R. Nachman of Breslav who expressed that although in general the stories are true, details may not be. Additionally, in the work Ohr Pnei Yitzchak (pg. 56) the author expresses an account in the name of the Rebbe, Rabbi Yitzchak of Gur that the stories are untrue. While Chabad Rebbe’s have indeed praised the work, it seems possible that it because they believed all the stories may have taken place, not that they actually did. For further discussion see Yehoshua Mundshein, Shivchei Ha-Besht (Jerusalem 1982) pg. 53ff.”  [Note: I believe R. Nachman quoted above should instead read R. Natan.]
[5] According to Moshe Rosman: “The text itself is problematic. The first Hebrew edition of 1814 was not based on an autograph manuscript. The one manuscript that does exist (and is also not an autograph) differs significantly from the printed text and from the manuscript employed by the printer. Moreover, the printer informed his readers that he edited the manuscript he utilized. He changed the order of some of the stories, added material from other sources, enclosed sixteen passages in parentheses, and emended the text.”
See Life Stories: Shivchei Ha-Besht by Moshe Rosman.
[6] Again, see a critique of this view by R. Dovid Markel above.
[7] Rachamei haAv, p. 47.