INTRODUCTION:
In reading rabbinic responsa literature (She’elot
uTeshuvot), Halacha, and other writings, one sometimes notices a
certain ambiguity. The subject matter is weighed up from all angles and then a
final verdict is provided. Before reaching the final conclusion, however, one
is presented with a number of options. What is the purpose of those options if
the field of choice is narrowed down to only one ruling at the end?
Is it just a style of writing or, depending on the
personality of the writer, is another dynamic perhaps at play?
Some examples follow:
