I have always been drawn to the teachings of the Rebbe of Kotzk. His approach was predicated upon uncompromising truth and intellectual independence. This allowed him to be fearless and never to succumb to societal pressures.
He knew that Judaism was so much deeper and more profound than the way it was perceived by the masses and bent by religious populism.
These essays, although not necessarily Kotzker in essence, are certainly Kotzk inspired.
Gershom Scholem studying the Zohar in his Sukka in 1925
Introduction
This article, based extensively on the research by Professor
Michael Brenner,[1] shows
how three Jewish scholars, Heinrich Graetz (1817-1891), Moriz Friedländer
(1844-1919) and Gershom Scholem (1897-1982) developed three different
approaches to the emergence of Gnosticism (an early form of mysticism). Brenner
shows, however, that each may have been motivated to some degree by personal
bias.
Tanchuma-Yelammedeinu named after the common phrase Yelamedeinu rabbeinu:"Let our master teach us."
Introduction
This article is based extensively on the research by
Professor Dov Wiess[1] and
discusses the changing rabbinic perspectives on the permissibility, or
otherwise, of arguing with, or challenging G-d. The Torah is replete with
references to Avraham, Moshe, Job, Jeremiah, Habakkuk and even some Psalms
challenging and protesting various actions of G-d. Talmudic and Midrashic
literature followed on a similar path by an expansion of this style of protest
writing, where the rabbis placed additional confrontational words into the
mouths of the biblical characters they commented upon. Thus, biblical and
rabbinic literature is overwhelmingly in favour of humans directing challenges
to G-d when they feel they have been unjustly treated. These bold and
challenging rabbinic texts flourish and peak particularly at the end of the Talmudic
period (around the seventh century).