Karaite synagogue in the Old City |
In one of the first formal works of halachic literature,
Rabbi Yitzchak Alfasi[1]
, also known as the Rif, instituted a number of innovations that hitherto had not
existed. These changes were as a direct result of the practices of a sect of
fundamental Jews, known as the Karaites, who adhered only to the literal Biblical
texts and completely disregarded all Rabbinic literature.
Tzvi H. Adams[2]
describes four instances where halacha underwent a dramatic change, due to
Rabbi Alfasi’s desire to actively disassociate himself from Karaite practices.
1) Rabbi Alfasi sounded the shofar on Rosh HaShana
when it fell out on Shabbat (something it can do five times in ten years), even
though this explicitly went against the Talmudic ruling never to sound the
shofar on Shabbat.[3] The reason why he did this was to protest the
fact that the Karaites never sounded the shofar on Rosh HaShana, as they could
find no scriptural imperative to do so.[4]
2)
Rabbi Alfasi ruled that maariv or evening
prayers were henceforth to be considered an obligatory prayer service.[5]
Traditionally maariv was regarded as an optional service, as it did not
correspond to the tamid offering of the Temple ritual which took place
only in the morning and afternoon. The Karaites thus prayed twice a day
corresponding to the Temple sacrifices, and Rabbi Alfasi wanted to disconnect
from these Karaite customs. Interestingly enough, the Jews of France and
Germany, where there was no Karaite presence, continued to pray only twice a
day.
3)
He further ruled that the minor fast days (such
as the Fast of Ester) would also transition from optional to obligatory, as the
Karaites did not fast on those days. In fact they had a very different fasting calendar
altogether. By making the fasts mandatory, Rabbi Alfasi found yet another way
of separating the Rabbinite (as mainstream Judaism was known) and Karaite
communities. (Again, the Jews of France and Germany having no Karaite
communities continued to regard these fasts as optional.)
4)
He also instituted a six hour waiting period
between meat and milk. Hitherto the standard practice had always been that
after eating meat, all one needed to do was kinuach vehadacha (to clean
the teeth and rinse the mouth) and then one could partake of milk. The reason
for instituting a six hour wait, was again to protest the Karaites who did eat
meat and milk together.[6]
The questions of course beg; Who were these Karaites? How
significant a threat were they to Rabbinic Judaism? And how numerous and
powerful were they that Rabbi Alfasi had to resort to such drastic measures to
combat their influence?
ORIGINS OF THE KARAITES:
The Karaites are (they still exist today) a group of Jews
who believe in the literal interpretation of the Torah, without any influence
from the vast literature of Rabbinic interpretation. They formed a new religion
based solely on the written word of the scriptures, without any recourse to the
Oral Tradition, although their claim was that they represented the original
form of Judaism as it would have been practiced in Biblical times. The term
‘Karaites’ (or Karaim in Hebrew) is derived from the word mikra,
meaning ‘scriptures’.
According to most accounts, the movement began during the
post-Talmudic or Gaonic Period (589 – 1038 CE), by Anan ben David (715 – 795).
The 8th C saw the rapid spread of Islam[7]
and (probably as a result of new theological challenges) also saw the creation
of many new religious sects. Judaism, likewise, was also not immune to the
emergence of various sects within its own ranks[8].
Karaism was one such sect. However, unlike the other sects that were soon to
disappear or become incorporated into Rabbinic Judaism, Karaism was there to
stay. At one stage almost half of the entire Jewish population were Karaites,
attracting the wealthy and influential. In Babylonia, the majority of Jews were indeed Karaites[33]. This was not a movement to be ignored.
There are many accounts describing the rise of Anan ben
David. A popular version describes how his uncle was the Exilarch[9].
In those days the political power rested with the Exilarch, while the religious
power was vested within the Gaon. When his uncle died childless, he thought
(being a descendent of the House of David and a scholar of note) he would
succeed his uncle as Exilarch. But as it turned out, he did not get the
appointment. He then tried to become the next Gaon, but again failed in his
attempts. Becoming very bitter, he decided to create his own breakaway sect
where he could serve as ultimate leader.[10]
Other accounts do exist, painting him in a better light, portraying
him as an intellectual who drew on earlier teachings particularly the Sadducees
and Essenes who also favoured a more literal reading of the Torah.[11]
Counter intuitively, Anan’s new form of Karaism was more
ascetic and stricter than the Judaism practiced in his day. The early followers
never ate meat at all (although later generations relaxed some of their former
stringencies and did permit the consumption of meat, even with milk).[12]
They never ate warm food[13],
nor did they exit their homes, on Shabbat. They were stricter in their laws of
slaughtering requiring not just two ducts to be severed, but also veins and
arteries. They fasted on the 7th day of every month and also
observed a 70 day fast over the Pesach and Shavuot period, with no food to be
eaten during the days. They also forbade the use of medicines as only “I, G-d,
shall heal you”.[14]
So, unlike the liberal modern reform movements of today, the
Karaites practiced a much stricter and harsher form of Judaism.
Around the 10th Century, the Karaites began
moving westwards from Iraq and Persia to Israel, North Africa and Spain. Soon
they were living side by side with Rabbinites in all their communities, except
for France and Germany. According to documents found in the Cairo Geniza[15],
there was constant collaboration between the Karaites and Rabbinites, including
(what appears to be mutually sanctioned marriages), right up until the 13th
Century.[16]
THE GREAT DEBATES:
There are fascinating accounts about many great debates
between the Rabbinites and the Karaites that took place during this period.
RAV SAADIA GAON DEBATES WITH THE KARAITES:
One of the early debates[17]
took place between Rav Saadia Gaon[18]
and a Karaite named Ben Zuta[19].
Together they tackled the question of whether ‘an eye for an eye’ was to be
taken literally. The Gaon argued that it cannot be taken literally because what
would happen if one person hit another and only damaged say, one third of the
victim’s eye. How would one fairly administer the punishment on the perpetrator
without damaging more than a third of his eye, perhaps even causing him to
become completely blind? Ben Zuta simply responded with verses that supported
equal and corresponding punishments[20].
Then the Gaon asked what would happen if the perpetrator was a blind man? The
only way justice would be served in such a case was with monetary compensation.
This was again rejected by Ben Zuta.
[It should be pointed out that not all Karaites took ‘an eye
for an eye’ literally. Some developed what became known as the Sevel
HaYerusha (Burden of Inheritence), which was almost like another Oral
Tradition, mirroring that of the Rabinites, as it is very difficult for any
system to adhere literally to texts which often contain a degree of ambiguity.
This move away from absolute literalism may have taken place under the
leadership of Binyamin Nahwendi who succeeded Anan ben David. The movement now
became less ascetic, and started portraying itself as more rational (similar to
the approach adopted by the early Islamists)[21].
An example of an alternate Karaite way to explain ‘an eye
for an eye’ as referring to monetary compensation for damage (instead of the
actual taking of an eye) can be found in a different Torah verse; “And one who
kills an animal shall render monetary payment, a life for a life”. [22]
Since this verse refers to monetary compensation, and since such monetary
compensation is referred to as a ‘life for a life’, it shows that the
expression ‘a life for a life’ does not always have to be taken
literally.[23]]
Rabbi Danzig[24]
points out something that the reader may not easily pick up from a cursory
reading of the debate; namely that Rav Saadia Gaon’s strategy was to constantly
use logic and rationale in his
arguments, while Ben Zuta mainly used verses from the scriptures as the main
thrust of his arguments. Apparently this style of debate, one using rationale
while the other literal text, was popular at that time.[25]
THE KARAITES FIGHT BACK:
The Karaites, for their part, didn’t take these debates
lightly. They fought back with retorts of their own. An example of such a
rejoinder can be found in the writings of Salamon ben Yerucham[26],
who is known as a fiery conversationalist who attacks Rav Saadia Gaon. He writes (I paraphrase):
“I have looked into the six divisions of the Mishna and
they are the words of modern man...They contain no majestic signs or miracles
and lack the formula; ‘And G-d spoke to Moses’. They are contradictory in
content. One scholar declares a thing forbidden, while another declares it
permitted. Had I been among them I would not have accepted these opinions,
because I am just as great a scholar as them. Saadia’s heart is overlaid with
stupidity like fat. I will do battle with him and strike down his sword. I will
challenge him lest the blackguard (Saadia) thinks he has an unanswerable
argument. If G-d wanted an oral Tradition, He would have instructed Moses to
write it down. It is written ‘The Law of G-d is perfect’, so why do we need a
written Mishna? And even if the Talmud originated with Moses, then why do we
need ‘another view’? Where do you flee you Fayyumite (Saadia)? Come out for
battle!”[27]
THE RAMBAM DEBATES
WITH THE KARAITES – A THAWING OF ANIMOSITY:
Almost three hundred years later Maimonides[28]
was still engaging in extensive debates with the Karaites. However, his method
of debate differed dramatically from the earlier style of the Gaonim. Instead
of using rationale and logic, he chose to use the same debating techniques as
the Karaites themselves, namely textual verses. Some explain that the reason
why he chose this style of argument, was so as not to enter into unnecessary
conflict with them. He wanted to show that he could, so to speak, beat them at
their own game by keeping to their rules.[29]
While he spent much of his lifetime battling the Karaite belief system, he did
so amicably and even seems to have been sympathetic to them, hoping that
eventually they would return to rabbinic Judaism.
In fact the Rambam wrote that the Karaites ‘should be
treated with respect, honour, kindness and humility as long as they do not
slander the authorities of the Mishna and Talmud. They may be associated with,
one may enter their homes, circumcise their children, bury their dead and
comfort their mourners.’
Thus, as opposed to the times of Rav Saadia Gaon, it is
clear that in the era of the Rambam and in Egypt at least, relations between
both sides did improve. This even prompted a leading Karaite, Elijah Bashyazi,
to state that ‘most of the Mishna and Talmud comprise genuine utterances of our
fathers, and our people are obligated to study the Mishna and Talmud.’[30]
KARAITES TODAY:
Amazingly the Karaites continued to survive up to the
present day. There are a number of Karaite communities in Israel and North
America, with their own synagogues. It is difficult to ascertain the exact
number of Karaites today, with estimates from 300 families in Israel to as much
as 30 000 around the world.[31]
Karaite Tzitzit resembling 'chains' |
Traditional Tzitzit |
Interestingly, according to Karaite practice, their Tzitzit
are somewhat different from the traditional rabbinic version. The strings are
tied to represent chains, as the verse says; ‘Gedilim (chains) shall you make
for yourselves on the four corners of your garments.’[32]
They also include one blue strand, made out of any dye available as there is no
literal indication in the Torah as to the exact origin of the blue thread.
CONCLUSION:
I have never before had the opportunity to look into Karaite
history and understand just what a significant movement it was. I have of
course come across numerous references to the movement but always believed it
to have been a rather small and insignificant cult. To have discovered that there may have been a time
when the numbers of Rabbinites and Karaites were almost equal, and that the
Karaites were generally wealthier and better connected politically than their
Rabbinic counterparts, is a fascinating and frightening revelation. Imagine the
form Judaism could have taken, if after teetering in the balance, the Karaites
would have emerged historically dominant and Rabbinic Judaism had become
something of a sub-movement?
It is thanks to the codification and innovation of people
like Rif and Rambam, who are often accused of over codifying Judaism, that we
have the Judaism we have today.
It is also important to understand when and why these new
innovations were introduced, so that we do not perpetuate the mistaken belief
that they always were there.
[1] 1013
– 1103. Rabbi Alfasi lived in Fez, Morocco, hence his title Alfasi (of
Fez). His teacher was Rabbenu Chananel,
and he spent ten years in his father-in-law’s attic working on his legal code, entitled
Sefer HaHalachot. Similar to Rambam who was born about thirty years after
Alfasi’s passing, he wanted to create a code that would present the law as
derived from the Talmud, but without the lengthy and complicated process of
derivation and debate that typified Talmudic literature. His work opened and
brought Talmudic concepts to the masses. One of his students was Rabbi Yehudah
HaLevi of Kuzari fame. He also taught Rabbi Yosef ibn Migrash who went on to
become one of Rambam’s teachers.
[2] See
The Seforim Blog – R. Yitzchak Al-fasi Anti-Qaraite Legislative Activity.
[3] See
Talmud Bavli, Rosh HaShana 29b.
[4]According
to the Karaites, ‘Yom Teruah’ meant not a day of trumpeting but a day of
singing, as there is no direct literal connection between teruah and shofar
as it relates to Rosh HaShana (as opposed to sounding the horn of trumpeting
on the Yom Kippur preceding a Jubilee year).
[5] Rabbi
Alfasi was not the only one to consider maariv to be a chova
(obligatory).
[6] The
Karaites interpreted the verse ‘Do not cook a kid in its mother’s milk’ as literally
prohibiting only a kid goat and its mother. All other meat could be eaten
together with milk. Incidentally, the first generation of Karaites were very
ascetic and prohibited eating meat completely. The latter generations were more
lenient and permitted meat to be eaten, even with milk.
[7]
According to Dr. Henry Abrahamson, the reason why Islam was so successful and
spread so fast, was because at that time it placed Reason before Revelation,
and virtually created a scientific revolution, appealing to intellectuals in
all the lands it spread to. (Anan ben
David and Karaism Jewish History Lecture 2012)
[8]
Such as the Malakites, Shadganites, Mishawaites, Isawites and Yudganites.
[9] Or
‘Reish Galuta’ in Hebrew.
[10] See
Jewish History. Org; The Early Geonic Period, by Rabbi Berel Wein adapted by
Yaakov Astor.
[11]
Another account of Anan ben David’s rise to prominence paints a slightly
different picture; Early Islam respected the Davidic line of ancestry. The Califs wanted the Exilarch (the Jewish
political leader) to be of that line. Anan’s younger brother got chosen to be
the Exilarch. Anan was upset and led a protest which ultimately got him
arrested. In prison he met an Imam who was to go on to establish a rationalist
Islamic movement. The Imam advised him to tell the Calif that he (Anan) was not
representing the Jewish people, but instead was representing a new and
different movement entirely separate from Judaism. The Calif accepted that, and
Anan ben David was released and went on to establish the Karaite movement. (See
Dr Henry Abrahamson, ibid.)
[12] As
the Torah say not to cook a kid in its mother’s milk. Thus only literally a kid
in its mother’s milk is forbidden, but any other meat and milk would be
permitted.
[13] As
the Torah says not to make a fire on Shabbat. The Rabbis agree that you can’t
make a fire, but they say you can use one that is already burning.
[14]
Shemot 25, 26.
[15] The
second story of an old synagogue in Fostat outside Cairo was the final resting
place of a huge amount of Hebrew books and documents. Hebrew holy books (and in
this case even secular documents ) were not allowed to be thrown away, and were
instead respectfully placed in perpetual archival storage. This particular Sheimos
(repository containing books with G-d’s holy names) or Geniza (storage)
remained closed for 900 years and was only opened in the late 19th
Century.
From documents in the Cairo Geniza, it emerges that
Rabinites and Karaites interacted well with each other and there appears to
have been mutual cooperation even regarding marriage, divorce and conversion.
(Further discussion is necessary to understand how these three events were able
to take place within a framework of halacha that would have been acceptable to
the Rabbinic establishment. Possibly
these documents reflect the situation in Egypt, where in the times of the
Rambam there was mutual respect for each other and a workable relationship.
Historically Beit Hillel and Beit Shamai were also able to agree on practical
halachic standards and procedures, even though their views often differed. –Not
that I’m suggesting comparing the Karaites and Rabinites to Hillel and Shamai.)
[16] See
The Seforim Blog; Waiting Six Hours for Dairy.
[17] This
particular debate is recorded in Ibn Ezra’s commentary on Shemot 21, 24.
[18]
Rabbi Saadia Gaon (882 – 942 CE.) was one of the leading rabbinic figures of
the Gaonic Period, one of the first to write in Arabic, and whose Emunot veDeot
was the first work to reconcile Jewish theology with Greek philosophy.
[19] Also
known as Abu al Surri Sahl ben Zuta. He appears to have been a kind of Karaite
missionary who was quite eloquent and who chose to write in Arabic to get
maximum publicity for his views. See Deconstructing the Bible; Abraham ibn
Ezra’s introduction to the Torah, by Irene Lancaster.
[20] “As
someone made a wound in another, so shall one be made in him.” (Vayikra 24,20)
[21] Anan
ben David and Karaism Jewish History Lecture 2012, by Dr Henry Abrahamson.
[22]
Vayikra 24,18.
[23] I
found this argument in a modern day Karaite website; Karaite Insights,
Figurative Use of the Phase “A Life for a Life”.
[24]
Maimonides Heritage Center, Parshat Mishpatim.
[25] See
also Yehudah HaLevi, Kuzari 3, 46-7.
[26] 910 –
960. He lived in Jerusalem and is considered one of the Karaites greatest
scholars, achieving the title of Chacham. He is also mentioned in the
Karaite prayer book as one of their main leaders (See Karaite Siddur i,137b).
His chief work is entitled Milchamot Hashem in which he vehemently
attacks Rav Saadia Gaon. .
[27] See
Karaite vs. Rabbinite, Salmon ben Yerucham, Canto 1 and 2.
[28] 1135
– 1204.
[29] The
Rambam used this same technique in his other debate with the Aristotelians, so
as not to create conflict either. While discussing the eternity of the universe
theory, the Rambam does not challenge them but instead even shows how, in
theory, the verses of the Torah could support such a view. Yet, although he
himself rejected such a theory, he was prepared to entertain an opposing view
as well. See Moreh Nevuchim 2,25.
[30] See
Karaites; Attempts at Reconciliation between Karaism and Rabbanism.
NOTE:
The Rambam also imposed a waiting period of six hours between meat and milk, but instead of saying that this was to differentiate between Rabbinites and Karaites (as the Rif did), he gave the reason basar ben shinav (meat maintains its status up to six hours). My theory is that he specifically gave a 'halachic' reason rather than a 'political' one, in order to ensure good relations with the Karaites. On the other hand, Tosefos located in France, where there was no Karaite community, held that milk could be consumed miyad (immediately after meat, provided one had cleaned and rinsed the mouth prior to its consumption).
[31] Dr
Henry Abrahamsom believes the last figure to be a significant exaggeration.
[32]
Devarim 22,12. They also braid the tzitzit because the word tzitzit can
means ‘braid’ as in a ‘braid of hair’ from the verse; ‘and took me by a braid
of my hair’. See Karaite Korner, Karaite Tzitzit.
[33] I thank Dr Avi Harel for pointing this out to me.
Tanakh
ReplyDeletefirst book of Samuel has fifty mistakes.
second book of Samuel has seventy mistakes.
first book of Kings has eighty mistakes.
second book of Kings has one hundred mistakes.
Tanakh has three hundred mistakes in four books.
Book of Ezra has thirty mistakes.
Deuteronomy has sixty mistakes.
Tanakh has three hundred ninety mistakes in six books.
hahaha you are so funny
Delete"If G-d wanted an oral Tradition, He would have instructed Moses to write it down."
ReplyDelete"...I am just as great a scholar as them."
These two statements seem to contradict one another. Unless something is lost in the translation.