Once again I am very happy to present another guest post by Rabbi Boruch Clinton. [See his previous post.]
Rabbi Clinton has taught at yeshiva and Beis Yaakov High Schools for twenty years. He currently works as an information technology content provider, authoring books and courses on cloud computing, technology security, server virtualization, and Linux system administration.
For more, visit his site Marbitz.com.
The article follows and his message at the end is, I believe, very pertinent to our times:
Social Injustice - When Leadership Fails:
Rabbi Clinton has taught at yeshiva and Beis Yaakov High Schools for twenty years. He currently works as an information technology content provider, authoring books and courses on cloud computing, technology security, server virtualization, and Linux system administration.
For more, visit his site Marbitz.com.
The article follows and his message at the end is, I believe, very pertinent to our times:
Social Injustice - When Leadership Fails:
Before reading this essay, it might be helpful to take a
look at these passages from Isaiah: 1:17-27, 5:7-9; 10:1-3; 58:6-9 and 59:3-9
If there’s only one thing that becomes abundantly clear from
reading Isaiah’s words, it is that God cares deeply about the suffering endured
by the weak at the hands of Jewish society’s rich and powerful classes. But
why? Why is this such a key focus more than, say, the mitzvah to love
your neighbor, or than the related but distinct mitzvah to avoid
spreading slander? What is it that makes promoting civic justice into a deal
breaker?
To better grasp the problem of social morality from God’s
own perspective, let us enumerate at least some of the specific accusations
that He, through the words of Isaiah, levelled against us:1
Deceptive commercial practices.
We tried to pass
lower-value, silver plated coins as sterling; we improperly diluted expensive
drinks (like wine) and sold them as though they were pure. (1:22)
Corrupt leadership.
We tolerated or even appointed senior
officials with connections to criminal gangs and whose main motivation was
graft. The officials’ constituents and their legitimate interests were the
primary victims. (1:23)
Inaccessible courts.
Courts and other institutions that
should have provided advocacy or at least a fair forum for the poor, instead
indirectly discouraged needy litigants from initiating court action (in part
through the existence of unnecessarily complicated and intimidating
procedures). (ibid. See Rashi)
Dishonest real estate practices.
The powerful would use
their wealth and influence to force weaker individuals to sell their property,
often purposely buying adjoining properties and illegally moving boundary
markers on multiple sides until what was left of the estate became too small to
viably maintain. (5:8 – See Rashi)
Fraudulent documents.
Through the drafting and signing of
false contracts and documents, specifically the poor and helpless were deprived
of their legal rights. (10:1-2)
Spending illegally obtained wealth.
We used the proceeds of
crime in (vain) attempts to buy our security through bribes paid to foreign
powers. (30:12 – see Radak)
Bullying.
Powerful and well-connected individuals abused
their natural advantage over their weaker opponents by bullying them into
silence as their cases were heard in court. The poor, unable to hire advocates
of their own, were thus usually unable to properly stand up for what was justly
theirs. (32:7 – see Daas Sofrim)
General oppression of the weak.
The effects of financial and
judicial abuse are depicted as forms of imprisonment for their victims (often,
the poor are left trapped by very difficult circumstances, unable to break free
of powerful bonds – Isaiah blames this on their oppressors). (58:6)
One should also see the Gemara (Shabbos 139a) which, based
on Isaiah 14:5, sharply criticizes…
Jewish judges who allow themselves (מקל
לחזניהם) to be used by their
staff and handlers in order to facilitate corrupt schemes…and prominent Torah scholars who strengthen and provide
cover for the crimes of their corrupt relatives serving as judges (שבט מושלים).
Alternatively (according to Mar Zutra), the verse could be
referring to Torah scholars who support otherwise unqualified judicial
candidates (דייני בור) on the
mistaken assumption that they will consult authorities before rendering
decisions in areas beyond their competency.
Working with each phrase from Isaiah 59:3 (“Your hands are
stained with blood and your fingers with sin, your lips speak lies and your
tongues crookedness”), the above Gemara then records the opinion of Rabbi
Shimon ben Lakeish:
“Your hands are stained with blood” these are the (crooked)
judges
“your fingers with sin” these are the court scribes (who
enable and perpetuate corrupt court decisions)
“your lips speak lies” these are the advocates2
“your tongues crookedness” these are the litigants
(presumably the ones who initiate the corrupt court cases)
What is Civic Justice?
Over and over again, as we have now seen, the prophet
admonishes his people over their neglect for others – especially others left
vulnerable by difficult lives. Clearly, the problem is more than just a
relatively isolated weakness in Torah observance (as we might classify a
failure to properly observe the laws of, say, kosher food), but stands directly
and violently opposed to everything that a Jew is meant to be.
Overwhelmingly, Isaiah’s rebukes are delivered in the
context of the words “justice” and “righteousness” – משפט
וצדק. Before properly
understanding the larger subject, we should see if we can’t achieve a better
understanding of these words themselves.
The verb “shafet” (שפט) means to bring something to its
proper place.3 Its
noun, “mishpat” (משפט) is hence a
process which seeks (to paraphrase Rabbi Hirsch) the satisfactory fulfilment
of justified demands. In other words, a human being has a right to his lawful
property, status and dignity. When he is illegally deprived of these
possessions, he has the right to demand their return. The institution of mishpat –
justice – is the tool through which his claim should be addressed.
The noun “tzedek” (צדק), on the other hand, denotes the place
where things belong. An act of “tzedaka” – righteousness – therefore,
involves acting as one should; disposing of assets as God would have them
disposed. Or, in Rabbi Hirsch’s own words: “doing one’s duty…in accord with the
will of God…The fulfilment of the Torah…It takes into account the
requirements, rather than merely the legal claims, of the person concerned.”
Thus, mishpat acknowledges and promotes the legal
rights of individuals when they come in conflict with each other or the state.
While Tzedaka places the burden of Divinely-inspired perfection
directly on the shoulders of each individual and each instrument of the state,
regardless of the purely legal strengths or weaknesses of their opponents’
claims.
These principles, tzedek and mishpat, are
what we mean by the phrase “civic justice.” Both of these together – the sense
of responsibility towards the rights of our fellow human beings and the sense
of obligation to the morality of God’s Torah – form the only reasonable
foundation for a Jewish community. Their absence is inherently corrupting of
both communal and private life.
Now, in light of these tzedek and mishpat ideals,
let’s take another look at the prophet’s particular criticism. Nearly all of
the examples from our list above involve abuse of privilege: members of
society’s powerful classes seeking to enhance their own positions at the expense
of the poor and weak. There can be no doubt that crime is wrong no matter who
commits it and no matter who is the victim.
The poor may no more expect a court
to wrongly tilt justice towards them than the rich.4 But,
nevertheless, Isaiah largely ignores the Robin Hoods of the Jewish world. While
they, too, may be reprehensible thieves, they are not guilty of quite such a
grievous form of oppression.
Tzedek and mishpat are
primarily the responsibility of the powerful. Of leaders.
Who constituted the powerful classes of Isaiah’s world?
Kings and government officials, judges, the wealthy, large landowners and Torah
scholars5…anyone
whose social standing allowed him some control over others and who could call
on highly-placed allies when needed. These are the people who are most tempted
by crimes of power and it is to these people that Isaiah’s message of social
morality is addressed.
At this point it is very important for us to stop and
consider a serious problem. Among others, Isaiah charged the Torah leadership
of his day (and perhaps of all generations) with what would, at best, amount to
gross dereliction of duty. At worst, they were engaged in willful criminal
collusion with some of society’s worst elements – at the tragic expense of the
community’s most vulnerable individuals. How are we to understand this? Does
the study of Torah at its highest levels have no moral impact on its students?
Were that generation’s custodians of our ancient tradition really such vile
people?
No. And a thousand times no. We must always remember to
evaluate a prophet’s carefully chosen words in their greater context.6 First
of all, there is no proof that all, or even significant numbers of the Torah
scholars of that time were at any fault at all. Perhaps even one individual’s
descent into corruption would have warranted the kind of national introspection
demanded by Isaiah. Secondly, many of the charges (like those based on 14:5)
indicate weakness under pressure or naiveté rather than malevolence. Hardly
admirable qualities in a leader, but nor quite such a breech of basic morality.
Most importantly, however, we must take into account the
principle of social interdependence:
“The cow of Rabbi Elazer ben Azariya (was thought to have
inappropriately been allowed to walk in a public place on Shabbos while
wearing a decorative ribbon): Did he have only one cow? …Didn’t his annual
tithe consist of 12,000 calves? It was (therefore) taught: (this cow) wasn’t
his, but belonged to his neighbor, and since he didn’t rebuke (the neighbor),
the cow is referred to as though it was his. (It was taught)…Anyone with the
opportunity to rebuke his own household and doesn’t, will be caught (i.e.,
punished) for (the sins of) his household. (Anyone with the opportunity to
rebuke the citizens of) his city (and doesn’t) will be caught for (the sins of)
his city. (Anyone with the opportunity to rebuke the) entire world (and
doesn’t) will be caught for (the sins of) the entire world…as Rabbi Chanina
taught: why does it say (Isaiah 3:14) ‘God in judgment will come (against) the
elders of His nation and its ministers’? If its ministers sinned, what did the
elders do wrong? Rather, say that the elders (will be punished) because they
didn’t rebuke the ministers.” (TB Shabbos 54b and 55a)
A Torah scholar is, by definition, expected to provide a
moral influence on those around him. The greater his scholarship, the more
people he is to influence. If people living within his “range” misbehave, it
must be because the scholar failed to educate them through the visible moral
example of his own conduct. Perhaps, in the privacy of his own home, he’s done
nothing wrong. But, after all, what was he doing spending all his time in the
privacy of his own home? In Isaiah’s world, privacy is a luxury reserved for
the spiritually mediocre.
So even if the real criminals weren’t learned Torah
teachers, it’s the teachers who will absorb the brunt of God’s wrath for the
crime. And if they’re the ones being punished, we can be sure that they’ve
somehow failed to live up to what’s expected of them.
Why is Civic Justice so Important?
What is it about injustice that seems to have captured so
much of Isaiah’s attention? Why does the very security and future of the Jewish
people depend on the quality of their struggle to eliminate injustice? While
all mitzvos are precious and fully binding on all of us, not many are
given such overwhelming weight. What’s the difference?
What does Isaiah himself say about this?
“And Justice falls back, and Righteousness stands at a
distance. For Truth has stumbled in the street and Right can not come.” (59:14)
“…Since the truth has stumbled from the earth, even from the
Heavens, righteousness and justice will not come.” (Rashi)
Every one of God’s mitzvos carries an important
moral message and plays its role in shaping the Jewish personality and
community.7 But
it would seem that the particular role played by civic justice is to plant a
strong attachment to truth deep in the personality of the Jewish people. If we
– and particularly those prominent individuals who by rights should stand on
the front lines of this battle – resist and instead pursue our private,
short-sighted goals, then we have exiled truth from our midst. How then could
God continue to support and nurture us? Isn’t His very seal “truth”?8
The Gemara tells us of a similar consequence to a similar
flaw:
“King Agrippas (a decent, but genealogically unqualified
Judean king who reigned towards the end of the Second Temple period) stood to
accept (the Sefer Torah for the special reading of ‘Parshas Hamelech‘)
for which the sages praised him. When he reached (in his reciting, the words)
‘You are not able to place upon you a strange man’ (i.e., that someone without
a Jewish father could not be king), his eyes poured tears. They (the people)
said to him ‘Do not fear, Agrippas, you are our brother, you are our brother.'”(Mishna,
Sotah 41a)
“It was taught in the name of Rabbi Noson: at that moment,
the enemies of Israel (i.e., sinful Jews) became deserving of destruction, for
they had flattered Agrippas. Rabbi Shimon ben Chalafta said: From the day that
the power of flattery took hold, judgments were corrupted, behavior was ruined
and no man was able to say to his fellow (by way of honest rebuke): ‘my deeds
are greater than yours'” (Gemara, Sotah 41b9)
God will hold off His catastrophic punishments as long as
there is still hope for the people’s moral future. But once the truth itself
becomes a stranger to both public and private discourse; once a man may no
longer call crime by its real name, hope has run out.
Significance of Civic Justice in Jewish Life
If a wise man repeats something often, you can assume it is
of great significance. Let’s take a look at just how often and in which
contexts the principle of civic justice actually appears in Isaiah’s words:
Identity
Israel’s very identity is largely determined by the way they
treat the weak: if victims cry out from under the burden of their abuse, the
primary purpose of our national existence is called into question:
“For the House of Israel is a vineyard of God of Hosts and
the man of Judah was planted there as His joy. He (God) hoped for justice, but
instead (encountered) affliction; for righteousness, and instead (encountered
victims’) cries.” (5:7 – see also Rashi to 3:9)
Government
Justice is the key purpose – the raison d’être – of a Jewish
monarchy (or any similar institution of governance)
“Behold, for (the purpose of) righteousness is a king
crowned, and ministers rule for justice.” (32:1)
Security
The Jewish nation’s security depends on the quality of
public justice:
“Is this not the type of fast-day I choose? Open the bonds
(created by) lawlessness, release the ties (created by) injustice, set free
those (who are) bound, all injustice remove. Should you not break your bread
for the hungry and the lowly poor bring to your home? When you see the naked,
you shall clothe him and turn not your eye from your own flesh. Then, like the
morning, your light will break, and your healing will quickly blossom…”
(58:6-8)
When will the solutions to your needs appear, bursting forth
like the morning light? When – and only when – you have sufficiently cared for
those victims of oppression and need. It is unlikely, however, that Isaiah
could expect any individual on his own to effect the kind of widespread change
needed to set right such vast injustice. Rather, this is probably a message
aimed at an entire community. Or, better, every single community.
“For truth has stumbled in our streets.” (59: 14)
“Since the truth has stumbled from the earth, even from the
Heavens, righteousness and justice will not come.” (Rashi ibid)
Even God’s moral guidance of our world depends on at least
some minimal adherence to truth among His people. Without even that, we’re on
our own.
Destruction
Neglect for justice can lead directly to national
destruction:
“(God) hoped for justice, but instead (encountered)
affliction; for righteousness, and instead (encountered victims’) cries…In my
ears the Lord of Hosts (swore): will not many houses be desolate; large and
good (homes) without occupant?” (5: 7, 9)
And another example:10
“Woe! Those who inscribe fraudulent contracts; who write
dishonest documents. To divert the helpless from justice and to rob the poor of
My people of judgment, so widows should be their pillage and orphans they would
plunder. What will they do on the day of reckoning and for the destruction (וּלְשׁוֹאָה) that
will come from a distance? To whom will they run for help and where will your
honor (acquired through theft – Rashi) be abandoned?” (10:1-3)
Mitzvah observance
So many of our familiar and seemingly straightforward
day-to-day activities in fact lose their meaning and purpose if the needs and
rights of those less fortunate are ignored:
“Is this (i.e., what follows) not the type of fast-day I
choose? Open the bonds of lawlessness, release the ties of injustice, set free
those (who are) bound, all injustice remove.” (58:6)
Fasting – something so many of us regularly do with so little
thought – is primarily intended to focus our attention on the disadvantaged. It
is about this mitzvah that the prophet chooses to make his point.
But, bearing in mind our natural general tendency to allow observance to
degrade into nothing more than empty ritual, we would be foolish to assume that
it wasn’t equally applicable elsewhere.
So Jewish practice, identity, society and destiny depend to
some large degree on carefully ensuring that our communal institutions and
lives are fair and just. There’s no denying it: civic justice is, indeed, a big
deal.
What is Our Role?
So what are we to do?
For those of us who are neither major community leaders nor
world-class Torah scholars, how are these prophecies practically relevant?
Here are some ideas that might get you thinking:
The first thing is to keep your own eyes (and pockets) wide
open. Communities are improved through many small actions. If there are people
around you who need support through a difficult period, don’t turn away: be
helpful. If even one of us is inspired by this discussion to come to the aid of
even one extra needy person – as obvious as such behavior it might seem – then
this whole exercise will have been worthwhile.
Isaiah himself suggests the next crucial step:
“Learn to improve (what is around you), seek justice,
support the victim (of crime), judge the orphan, fight for the widow.” (1:17)
Indeed, we must each “seek justice” in our own lives and
communities. But it probably won’t happen by itself. Seeking justice and
sparking change requires skills that must be learned. Spend more time with the
kinds of seforim that deal with these things and, perhaps, find older
individuals who have experienced noticeable successes, seek their company and
learn from them.
Here’s one that is perhaps a bit less obvious than you might
think: make sure you are not part of the problem. Regularly subject your
activities and relationships to some form of analysis,11 while
giving special thought to the impact you might be having on those under your
influence and power.
Now what should you do if you become aware of serious
community-level oppression? Your first address should be the office of a
significant talmid chochom who is also engaged enough in political
matters to be considered an “insider” – someone likely to be privy to the
community’s hidden workings. He will be able to tell you if the issue is
already being satisfactorily dealt with or if it is indeed an issue at all
(perhaps the problem lay in your limited understanding of the affair). If the
problem does turn out to be unsolved, it is quite likely that, assuming that
you are a discreet and resourceful individual, the rav will advise
you on an effective course of action.
It should be noted that regarding cases of dangerous
criminal behavior, recent halachic literature suggests that one
should immediately go to the local police and let those who have been properly
trained and empowered take over.
Finally, it is worthwhile giving some thought to identifying
oppression’s modern face in the Jewish community. Is it school administrations
which exclude students for ethnic or ideological reasons? Is it those who cover
up and thereby enable crimes of abuse against innocent children? Is it those
who set new, more elaborate standards for “frum” fashion and simcha consumption,
thereby feeding rampant materialism within the Jewish world and pressuring
those with more meager means to follow their example and suffer the
consequences?
Perhaps this should be the subject of serious, objective
research.
1It
should be noted that each of these claims would appear to reflect real-world
transgressions. This isn’t a checklist of theoretical crimes we should avoid,
but very real crimes that had, to at least some degree, a significant presence
in Jewish life.
2See
Mishna Avos 1:8 (יהודה בן טבאי אומר, אל תעש עצמך כעורכי הדיינים)
3This
discussion is drawn from “Collected Writings of Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch”
Vol IV, pp 69-70
4see
Rashi to Deut. 1:17
5For
particular reference to Torah scholars and judges, see TB Shabbos 139a
6For
more on this subject, see the chapter “The Accusing Finger – Eli’s Sons:
Understanding Sin in the Tanach” from my book “The Royal Prophet”
7I
think it’s fair to say that Rabbi S.R. Hirsch’s primary task writing his
commentary to the Torah is to reveal just these messages.
8TB
Sanhedrin 64a
9ע’ ספר באר שבע למסכת סוטה דה”מ מותר להחניף
10See
the Gemara Shabbos 139a for more on the relationship between corrupt Jewish
leadership and national suffering. See also Collected Writings of Rabbi Samson
Raphael Hirsch vol. IV page 137 for an alternate reading of this verse.
11This,
in any case, is something strongly recommended by mussar seforim.
Abraham avinu was a great tzadik, Ishmael not.. Ithak avinu a great tzaddik, esav a rasha... so, its not jst about the example, its about free will of the individual
ReplyDelete