Did Yosef's brothers want to encourage their dogs to kill him? |
GUEST POST BY RABBI BARUCH CLINTON
Note: I'm unsure how to even translate the word
"derush". Words like "research" or
"investigation" come close, but the way it's used in Torah literature
has a clear overtone suggesting greater authority. And then, as we'll see,
there are two distinct ways the word is used even within the context of Torah.
What exactly is "Torah"? Are there limits to the kinds of explanations and interpretations that can reasonably be included and, by extension, connected with the Mt. Sinai revelation? It goes without saying that modern efforts to understand how Torah law (halacha) should be applied to our lives are legitimate parts of the process, as are ethical works (mussar) that are designed to inspire us to properly observe halacha. But is any derush-based interpretation automatically included? What about commentaries that claim to fill gaps in the Biblical historical record? Are they "Torah"? By what mechanism could they be included?